Skip to content

Artur Chrusciel

← Customer Feedback for GnuCash

My feedback

3 results found

  1. Add item count in the split

    2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Feature Request  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Artur Chrusciel commented  · 

    I haven't noticed stock account type previously but I am aware that item counting can be done through another account (this is my "petrol example"). I'm only wondering why don't add easier way of defining transactions for users not interested in adding stock account for every good they are buying.

    Stock approach fits better to business use case (where I am buying something to sell it in the future). For consumer only buying price is important. And this simple approach is easy upgradeable to stock concept as we are not loosing any information saving transaction.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Artur Chrusciel commented  · 

    I don't fully understand inventory concept (I am home user with no background in professional accounting) but it seems to be more complex than my request. My point is just to have two additional (and optional) columns for transaction: "Item count" and "Item price". If they are not empty "Tot Spend" column is automatically calculated as Count * Price. That's all.

    Artur Chrusciel shared this idea  · 

  2. Transaction Classifications

    577 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    51 comments  ·  Feature Request  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Artur Chrusciel supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Artur Chrusciel commented  · 

    Some kind of labels would be useful to easily group transactions. Of course label functionality can be achieved by proper account structure but sometimes it isn't worth the work needed.

    BTW, in the example below I would prefer delegation over inheritance ;) and create virtual accounts:

    Properties:Property1
    Properties:Property2

    Then I would transfer from Cash to Electricity through Properties. Every property would be balanced to 0 but have all information about transactions related to this property. (This is similar to example from bugzilla link but transactions in Properties has values.)

  3. Display description of the split in Basic Ledger view

    18 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Feature Request  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Artur Chrusciel commented  · 

    Thanks for a quick answer. Maybe I didn't notice an option for it, but using default configuration I can choose between:
    1) Basic Ledger (I suppose this is single line view) which shows:
    Shop
    Shop
    2) Transaction Journal which shows whole Shop transaction
    3) Auto-split which combines 1 and 2

    What I would like to have is a view that shows two lines like a basic ledger but they are:
    apple
    orange
    and there is no line for juice visible.

    My typical use case is editing entries in Books account where books are splits in big transactions (titled like 'Amazon - order XYZ') containing also music, movies or comics. I would like to see only lines for books when reviewing Books account.

    Artur Chrusciel shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base

(thinking…)